PLAY.OPBLOCKS.COM
Players online.
OPBlocks • Community
Mochi
No /realname provided :/
Rizuri
But there is evidence. Look at Duckies comment. If substantial evidence is provided it is not a must to have the exact type of evidence needed. When it is clear that the username Jerreinemy hackusated then there should not be any problem in dealing out punishment. Different reports can be reconsidered looking at a case by case basis and if enough evidence is provided.
Rizuri
Some reports have to be looked at from a different perspective/point of view, not everything can be decided by the book
Mochi
We are not allowed to punish without proof of /realname. This is how it was always run to prevent players pretending to /nick as others and get them punished. We can not assume the player is Jerreneimy without this proof.
Rizuri
But it isn't possible to /nick into someone's ign
Mochi
If they are offline, it is possible.
DdubsRulez2
Why do you want Jerrienemy punished so bad? It's always been the rules that you need a /realname.
Rizuri
I don't care about Jerreniemy being punished I just find the fact that always having to refer to the rule book to make decisions being ridiculous when sufficient evidence for a report is provided
DdubsRulez2
It really wasn't sufficient evidence, as you have to have a realname for it to be sufficient evidence lol
Rizuri
If someone commits a crime you don't need a video of them doing such, using witnesses and evidences that put them at the place of the crime is enough to charge them and I think It should be such in reports. There can't just be one evidence needed to accept a report
Mochi
So I can get a group of friends and we all say and give "Evidence" that a player was hacking, without video proof, and the player gets banned... I don't think that is a valid way to punish a player.
Rizuri
Exactly because that is a word. Not any physical evidences. But here there is physical evidence.
Rizuri
And as I said witnesses + evidence (fingerprints etc)